• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Yorkshire's Employment Law & Data Protection Specialists

  • Home
  • About
    • About us
    • Brian Harrington
    • Nathan Combes
  • Services
    • Employment Law & HR Advice
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Data Protection
    • Training
    • Price transparency
  • Legal updates, news & events
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Home
  • About
    • About us
    • Brian Harrington
    • Nathan Combes
  • Services
    • Employment Law & HR Advice
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Data Protection
    • Training
    • Price transparency
  • Legal updates, news & events
  • Contact us
  • Search

Employer update | Homophobic statements & discrimination in employment

You are here: Home / Employer update | Homophobic statements & discrimination in employment

24th April 2020 //  by curcom76

The European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) has confirmed that homophobic statements made by a person or persons perceived as having “a decisive influence” over an organisation’s recruitment policy can constitute an act of discrimination and that in certain circumstances associations may bring legal proceedings in order to claim damages even if no injured party can be identified.

Case: NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI – Rete Lenford

The facts

The case involved a lawyer who had stated, in an interview given during an Italian radio programme, that he would never hire a homosexual person to work in his law firm.

Following the lawyer’s remarks an association of Italian lawyers tasked with defending the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or intersex (LGBTI) persons commenced court proceedings against the lawyer seeking damages.

An Italian court upheld a discrimination claim brought by an association for LGBTI lawyers. It ordered the lawyer to formulate an action plan to eliminate discrimination, and pay damages of EUR10,000.

The lawyer appealed and the case was subsequently referred to the ECJ by the Italian Supreme Court.

The ECJ

The ECJ was asked to confirm whether the homophobic remarks made by the lawyer on a radio programme during which he specifically stated that he would never employ gay lawyers were capable of amounting to discrimination under the Equal Treatment Framework Directive. It being a relevant factor that there was no active recruitment exercise at the time the remarks were made.

Following on from an earlier opinion given by Advocate General Sharpston, the ECJ had little difficulty in finding that statements “suggesting the existence of a homophobic recruitment policy” do fall within the concept of ‘conditions for access to employment … or to occupation’, in circumstances where the link between the person making the statement and the relevant organisation’s recruitment policy are more than “purely hypothetical”. The ECJ went on to confirm that whilst this will ultimately be a matter for national courts to decide that the status of the person making the statements and the capacity/context in which they are being made will constitute relevant factors that should be taken in to account.

Freedom of expression

The ECJ recognised that its decision might entail a possible limitation to the exercise of freedom of expression. However, it emphasised that freedom of expression is not an absolute right and that its exercise may be subject to limitations. It found that those limitations were engaged in the present case because the anti-discrimination directive had been implemented with the purpose of safeguarding the principle of equal treatment in employment and occupation and the attainment of a high level of employment and social protection.

Damages

The ECJ also found that the Directive permits national legislation to give associations (with a legitimate interest) the right to bring enforcement proceedings in the absence of an identifiable victim.

Our comments

It will be interesting to see whether this decision causes the UK’s own Equality and Human Rights Commission’s to seek to exercise the enforcement powers bestowed upon it by the Equality Act 2006.

Additionally, this case serves as a timely reminder to businesses and organisations that the personal opinions and beliefs of employees (particular senior employees) which are expressed publicly and/or in circumstances where they might reasonably be interpreted as constituting the employer’s own views may in the context of access to employment give rise to the threat of litigation and damages even where there is no active recruitment exercise taking place and/or any discernible victim.


Please contact us if you’d like more information about the issues raised in this article and/or or to find out more about the various Employment Law and HR related policies, procedures, guidance and training that we provide.

Harrington Law is a specialist and niche firm of employment law and data protection solicitors. The firm acts for and advises businesses and organisations in York, Leeds, Bradford and throughout the UK.

Disclaimer: the information set out above does not constitute legal advice and it is provided for general information purposes only. No warranty, whether express or implied is given and neither the author or Harrington Law shall be liable for any technical, editorial, typographical or other errors or omissions within the information provided.


Need employment law or HR help, guidance and support?

Contact us

You May Also Be Interested In:

Employer Update | Furlough Leave & Pay

Employer Update | TUC demands employers produce coronavirus (COVID-19) risk assessments

Employer update | Homophobic statements & discrimination in employment

morrisons supermarket vicarious liability

Who’s legally responsible when an employee “goes rogue”

Employer Update | Government announces new statutory right to neonatal leave and pay

covid-19 coronavirus graphic

Employer Update | COVID-19 (Coronavirus) & Data Protection

Data Protection | Understanding Brexit and the GDPR

Employer Update | Handling Disciplinaries

Data Protection | ICO issues fresh guidance regarding time limits for dealing with Data Subject Access Requests

Previous Post: «morrisons supermarket vicarious liability Who’s legally responsible when an employee “goes rogue”
Next Post: Employer Update | TUC demands employers produce coronavirus (COVID-19) risk assessments »

Primary Sidebar

NEWS & EVENTS

Employer Update | Furlough Leave & Pay

Flexibility The Government has now confirmed that from 1 …

Employer Update | TUC demands employers produce coronavirus (COVID-19) risk assessments

The Trades Union Congress ("TUC") has demanded that all …

Employer update | Homophobic statements & discrimination in employment

The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") has confirmed that …

morrisons supermarket vicarious liability

Who’s legally responsible when an employee “goes rogue”

In a landmark decision the Supreme Court has confirmed that the …

Employer Update | Government announces new statutory right to neonatal leave and pay

The government has confirmed that a new statutory right to up to …

Footer

Our Lawyers

  • Brian Harrington
  • Nathan Combes

Our Offices

BRIGHOUSE
19 Bradford Road
Brighouse
HD6 1RW
Tel: 01484 240633

 

YORK
The Studio
30 Acomb Road
York YO24 4EW
Tel: 01904 238896

 

CLECKHEATON
27 Northgate
Cleckheaton
BD19 3HH
Tel: 01484 240633

Contact Us

Contact us today – find out how we can help you.

  • Privacy Notice
  • Website Terms & Conditions

Site Footer

Harrington Law is a trading name of Harrington Law Limited which is a limited company registered in England and Wales  with registered number 11651440 whose list of directors is available for inspection at its registered office which is 19 Bradford Road Brighouse West Yorkshire.  Harrington Law Limited are solicitors of England and Wales authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA number 666091.  Details of the Solicitors Code of Conduct can be found at www.sra.org.uk.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT